tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9114398.post113524068348808118..comments2018-03-18T11:44:46.237-04:00Comments on Waiting for Vizzini: A better way to fight abortionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9114398.post-39909174073534196572011-06-03T09:55:31.120-04:002011-06-03T09:55:31.120-04:00so you're okay with Authorities (or God) killi...so you're okay with Authorities (or God) killing children for the alleged sins of their parents. but you get angry about abortion? That's not a very consistent pro life position.JosefKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01373243349715339325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9114398.post-51512660981745203102011-06-03T09:02:30.862-04:002011-06-03T09:02:30.862-04:00Ok, this is not an accurate interpretation of the ...Ok, this is not an accurate interpretation of the bible. Fist of all we must understand it says water and dust in Numbers, not some unknown concoction. This was supernatural. Second of all we must understand God's opinion on sin and adultry is sin. God did this (the judging of the women)and he is allowed to take our lives because he is God and he is holy. He judges sin very harshly like when the civil authorities stoned Achan and his family for Achan's sin. Luckily we are not under the law but because of the blood of christ we are under grace. Read Romans 6 if you think sin is allowed even under grace. There is no place the bible says it is ok to murder anyone. In fact the bible speaks of God knowing us and even ordaining Jeremiah a prophet while in the womb. The bible forbids killing (except as punishment by the government). Mankind is sinful and things happen like they did all through the bible but that does not mean God condones it. The death of the child in Numbers 5 was a result of the mother's sin that God knew about even though there was no proof. Sad thing about sin is that it never effects just one person.Jefferyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09243740488634887152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9114398.post-1136219095108658192006-01-02T11:24:00.000-05:002006-01-02T11:24:00.000-05:00That's because the choice is between helping low i...That's because the choice is between helping low income ( too busy working to get involved in politics) women, and men who clearly had the resources to get old in the first place. Who do you think a bunch of old, rich, white guys are going to side with?<BR/> And these abstinence only folks are the same type that a couple generations ago were fighting to keep birth control illegal, and claimed that a married woman couldn't acuse her husband of rape.<BR/> God forbid we educate kids to make their own choices about sex. Especially since the educated ones KNOW what the real risks are and usually wait LONGER.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9114398.post-1135293161037916602005-12-22T18:12:00.000-05:002005-12-22T18:12:00.000-05:00How about providing birth control to poverty level...How about providing birth control to poverty level women and families FREE? We provide old geezers with Viagra thru Medicare (read that FREE!) and yet we insists that families and women who need all their resources just to give their family the basics for survival pay for their own birth control medication. Or we tell them to abstain. (read that:We want the male old geezers to get theirs with our blessing, but you young women out there just have to keep the aspirin between your knees or pay the consequences!).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com